Dear Friend,

If you know someone that needs to be added to this policy briefing, please let us know by sending an e-mail here:  info@puregrassroots.org.

Commentary on Climate Change Over the Geologic Time Scale, a normal reality.

The Earth's climate has undergone dramatic changes over its 4.5-billion-year history, and these fluctuations are recorded in the geologic time scale. Each era, period, and epoch marks shifts in global temperatures, atmospheric composition, ocean currents, and ecosystems, driven by a complex interplay of factors, including tectonics, volcanic activity, changes in solar radiation, and biological evolution.

Precambrian (4.6 billion - 541 million years ago)

The Precambrian eon, which spans from the formation of Earth to the start of complex multicellular life, witnessed the most ancient and profound climate changes. Early in this period, Earth experienced a "hellish" phase called the Hadean, where volcanic activity and meteorite impacts kept surface temperatures too high to sustain life. As the planet cooled, the first oceans formed, and tectonic activity began to shape the early continents.

Around 2.4 billion years ago, the Great Oxygenation Event (GOE) dramatically altered Earth's atmosphere, driven by photosynthesizing cyanobacteria. This event not only introduced oxygen into the atmosphere but also triggered one of the most significant climate events in history—Snowball Earth. During Snowball Earth episodes (most notably during the Cryogenian period, around 720-635 million years ago), the planet is believed to have been entirely or almost entirely frozen, with glaciers extending from the poles to near the equator.

Paleozoic Era (541-252 million years ago)

The Paleozoic era saw significant shifts in climate, largely connected to the formation and breakup of supercontinents, including Gondwana and Pangaea. During the Cambrian period, global temperatures were warmer than today, and life diversified rapidly in the oceans, sparking the Cambrian Explosion.

In the late Paleozoic, the Earth entered an icehouse climate during the Carboniferous and Permian periods. Extensive forests, which would later form the planet’s coal deposits, drew large amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, leading to global cooling. This cooling culminated in the Permian ice age, a time when glaciers covered much of the southern hemisphere.

The end of the Paleozoic is marked by the Permian-Triassic Extinction around 252 million years ago, the largest mass extinction in Earth's history. While the exact cause remains debated, climate change—possibly triggered by massive volcanic eruptions and subsequent greenhouse gas emissions—likely played a critical role in this extinction event.

Mesozoic Era (252-66 million years ago)

The Mesozoic is often referred to as the "Age of Dinosaurs" and was characterized by warmer climates and higher sea levels than today. During the Triassic period, following the mass extinction, the Earth's climate stabilized, and life rebounded. By the Jurassic, the breakup of Pangaea began, and volcanic activity released substantial amounts of carbon dioxide, contributing to the warm, tropical climate that persisted through much of the era.

The Cretaceous period, the final period of the Mesozoic, reached some of the warmest global temperatures in Earth's history. Evidence suggests no polar ice caps existed during this time, and tropical conditions extended toward the poles. However, a sudden cooling event may have preceded the asteroid impact that marked the end of the Cretaceous period, contributing to the mass extinction that wiped out the dinosaurs 66 million years ago.

Cenozoic Era (66 million years ago - Present)

The Cenozoic era marks the age of mammals and is perhaps the most well-documented period of climate change, particularly due to the availability of fossil records and ice core data. After the extinction of the dinosaurs, Earth’s climate remained relatively warm during the Paleocene and Eocene epochs. The Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) around 55 million years ago was a brief but intense warming event, likely caused by a massive release of methane or carbon dioxide.

Following the PETM, the Earth entered a long-term cooling trend, leading to the formation of the Antarctic ice sheets during the Oligocene epoch (around 34 million years ago). Throughout the Neogene period, the northern hemisphere also began to develop ice sheets, leading to the onset of ice ages.

The Pleistocene epoch (2.6 million - 11,700 years ago) is marked by repeated glacial and interglacial cycles, where large portions of Earth’s surface were covered by ice sheets during colder phases. These glacial cycles were driven primarily by changes in Earth's orbit and axial tilt (Milankovitch cycles). The most recent ice age ended about 11,700 years ago, giving rise to the Holocene epoch, a warm interglacial period that continues today.

Anthropocene: A New Epoch?

While officially we live in the Holocene, many scientists argue that we have entered a new epoch called the Anthropocene, characterized by human-driven climate change. Over the last few centuries, human activity, especially the burning of fossil fuels, deforestation, and industrialization, has significantly altered the composition of Earth's atmosphere, raising levels of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases to levels not seen in millions of years.

This rapid increase in greenhouse gases is causing global temperatures to rise, leading to melting ice sheets, rising sea levels, shifting weather patterns, and increasing the frequency of extreme weather events. Unlike previous periods of natural climate change, the current warming trend is happening at an unprecedented rate due to human activity, posing significant challenges for ecosystems and human societies.

Bottom Line

Climate change has been a constant force throughout Earth's history, shaping and reshaping the planet’s surface and life forms. While natural forces such as volcanic activity, plate tectonics, and changes in solar radiation have driven these changes, the current Anthropocene epoch represents a new phase where human influence is now a dominant factor. Understanding the long-term context of climate change provides valuable insights into both the resilience of life and the potential consequences of our current trajectory.

If a second Trump presidency were to unfold, particularly under the framework of Agenda 47, there would likely be a distinct approach to climate change, environmental protection, and clean energy that differs from more traditional policies but still aligns with Trump’s broader vision of economic growth, national sovereignty, and energy independence.

1. A Focus on Energy Independence and Economic Growth

One of the cornerstones of Trump’s environmental and energy strategy is his strong emphasis on energy independence. During his first term, the U.S. achieved energy dominance, becoming a net energy exporter for the first time in decades, largely due to increased domestic oil and natural gas production. Trump has argued that reliance on domestic energy sources, rather than foreign oil, is key to national security and economic strength. His policy approach aims to keep energy costs low for consumers and businesses, which he sees as vital to ensuring a strong economy.

Trump has consistently viewed fossil fuels—oil, gas, and coal—as essential to U.S. prosperity, and under Agenda 47, we can expect continued support for these industries. His argument is that deregulation of the energy sector, particularly removing bureaucratic hurdles, allows for job creation, economic growth, and energy security. While this approach does prioritize traditional energy sources, it also aims to ensure that America can remain competitive in a global market.

2. Environmental Pragmatism and Deregulation

Trump’s environmental policies reflect what can be described as a pragmatic approach to regulation. He has often spoken about balancing environmental protection with economic realities. His administration rolled back or relaxed over 100 environmental regulations, not because of a desire to weaken environmental protections, but out of a belief that some rules were overly burdensome to industries and small businesses.

In a potential second term, Trump would likely continue promoting streamlined regulations, aiming to encourage business innovation and investment in the energy sector. From his perspective, scaling back on excessive regulation doesn’t mean abandoning environmental responsibility. In fact, Trump has pointed out that the U.S. has reduced carbon emissions more than many other countries, even without stringent climate regulations. 

3. Advocating for "All of the Above" Energy Strategy

While Trump’s rhetoric has often been more favorable toward fossil fuels, he has also supported an “all of the above” energy strategy, which includes nuclear energy and, to some extent, renewables. During his first term, the U.S. continued to increase its solar and wind capacity, driven by market forces and private-sector investment. Trump has stated that his goal is to allow energy markets to grow organically, without federal mandates or over-regulation, which could stifle innovation.

In a second term, while Trump may not focus as much on climate change mitigation as previous administrations, his administration could still promote the development of clean energy technologies that align with national security interests, such as nuclear energy and advanced natural gas technologies. These energy sources, while not completely carbon-free, could contribute to reducing emissions compared to coal or oil and play a role in energy transition.

4. Investment in Infrastructure and Resilience

Trump has consistently advocated for substantial infrastructure investment, and Agenda 47 could potentially see a renewed push for resilient infrastructure to protect against the impacts of climate-related disasters. His administration often spoke of improving the country’s infrastructure to withstand extreme weather events, although his first term did not see major legislative victories in this area.

In a second term, Trump’s focus might turn to projects aimed at climate adaptation, such as building stronger levees, improving water management systems, and bolstering coastal defenses to protect communities from flooding and storms. This would allow the U.S. to adapt to the reality of climate change while focusing on practical, immediate solutions rather than long-term global agreements.

5. Empowering the Private Sector

One of the key components of Trump’s approach is his belief in the power of the private sector to drive innovation and solve problems, including those related to the environment and energy. Instead of federal mandates and subsidies, Trump believes that market forces should lead the way in the clean energy transition. During his first term, advancements in wind and solar energy largely came from private companies responding to market demand.

Under Agenda 47, Trump would likely continue this approach, creating a business-friendly environment for technological innovations. By minimizing government intervention, Trump sees this as encouraging entrepreneurial efforts to develop clean energy solutions, whether it be through next-generation nuclear power, advancements in carbon capture, or breakthroughs in renewable energy storage.

6. U.S. as a Global Energy Leader

Trump’s energy policy also positions the U.S. as a global leader in energy production, and this could continue in a second term. His administration worked to export U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) to international markets, which he argued could help reduce Europe’s dependence on Russian energy, particularly in light of geopolitical conflicts. While natural gas is a fossil fuel, it burns cleaner than coal, and Trump has pointed to U.S. exports of LNG as contributing to global emissions reductions.

A second Trump presidency might further this strategy, arguing that U.S. energy exports—both fossil fuels and potentially nuclear technology—can help other nations transition to cleaner energy while ensuring global energy security.

Conclusion: A Different Path to Addressing Environmental and Energy Challenges

A second Trump presidency, viewed through the lens of Agenda 47, could focus on maintaining economic growth, ensuring energy independence, and reducing regulatory burdens on businesses while still addressing energy challenges through a more pragmatic lens. While Trump may not prioritize climate change in the same way as past administrations, his approach emphasizes energy security, economic pragmatism, and market-driven innovations that could play a role in addressing environmental and energy concerns.

P.S. Please forward this e-mail on to all the other activists in your network.